Smoke ’em if you got ’em (and if you’re rich, white and drunk)

The Wall Street Journal today ran a great front-page piece on the hookah bars in Queens, which are coming under pressure (who are the “neighbors” that are complaining???) since they illegally permit smoking. The hookah bars do not qualify for the so-called “cigar-bar” exemption from the city smoking law, because they don’t serve alcohol to their largely Muslim clientele. Meanwhile, the Carnegie Club, or swanky hipster hookah bars in the East Village, have no problem.

(This link should work whether or not you have a subscription; let me know if not.)

PS — new snow icon! But it’s now raining instead of snowing.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Your right to vote (and to have it counted)

If you’ve read about the nightmares of potential voting fraud all over the country, and the scary prospect of having your votes counted by Republican campaign contributors, then don’t think as a New Yorker you’ll be immune from those problems much longer. The Board of Elections is soliciting bids to replace our clunky-but-hard-to-defraud mechanical voting machines, and is skewing the process in favor of the companies we already know better than to trust.

Please see Democracy for NYC for more information. This is not a partisan issue. (Or at least, not unless one party believes it cannot win legitimately.)

This is a crosspost from newyorkers so please comment there.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

What Red States?

I think the red-state blue-state view of the country is overly simplistic, but nonetheless this map from the Daily Kos is amusing.

Utah and Idaho, the last holdouts…

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 7 Comments

Yes, I’m still a writer…

Back in the spring, I collaborated on a pair of brief articles with Barry Bealer, CEO of Really Strategies, a content-management consultancy, about standards and how they’re used in the real world. (Standards in this instance meaning markup languages for text and other metadata standards such as PRISM or IPTC for images, etc. — hence the “angle bracket” reference in the headline.) Barry’s half was about how standards help consultants and other “solutions providers” like himself; my half talked about the view of publishers and editors who have to deal with “content” (or what, in my case, we like to call “news”) in the real world. The article was published in the April/May 2005 issue of the Software and Information Industry’s Upgrade magazine, but there’s now a PDF of Translating the Angle Bracket Crowd available to non-members on Really Strategies’ web site. It’s a short article, but I don’t publish much writing nowadays so it’s worth pointing out.

In separate semi-writing news, CyberJournalist.net published my “Top Ten Reasons To Read a Newspaper” earlier this month. It was a somewhat (but not entirely) humorous response to their “Top Ten Reasons For Reading a News Site.” I’ve spent more than 15 years in online news publishing, and I believe in it strongly, but I read news in print as well as online and I think each medium has a place. Newspapers will probably change drastically — just as radio changed after television was born — but there are many advantages to offline reading and I don’t think it’s going to disappear.

My web site features both of these articles, as well as many others I’ve written in the past 15 or 20 years. (I don’t have electronic copies of almost any of my published writing prior to 1987, when Brooklyn College’s Kingsman newspaper moved from traditional cold-type publishing to a Macintosh typesetting system.)

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 5 Comments

Nikola Tesla and the Sparks From Mars

David Bowie to play Nikola Tesla in The Prestige, a new film by Christopher Nolan.

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

I Can’t Do It

The nasty leer of Rudy Giuliani on a campaign mailing finally decided me: I cannot vote for Mike Bloomberg. Yes, he’s done a good job as mayor, certainly a better job than Ghouliani. But you must, to some extent, be judged by the company you keep. Bloomberg’s inexcusable and inexplicable support for the Repugnant Party, — giving buckets of money to help re-elect Shrub, trampling all over our civil rights to make the city more hospitable for the convention — and his support of ridiculous development projects for his real-estate cronies, make him ineligible for my vote.

I might actually vote for Ferrer. I don’t think he’d be a good mayor — he’s an old-line county-machine pol — but the election has already been sold to the main with billions of dollars. And I would like Bloomberg to see that some people in the city still think decent schools and affordable housing are more important than glitzominiums and sports stadiums.

Then, of course, there’s Jimmy McMillan, the candidate of the Rent Is Too Damn High party. He’s got a sense of humor, and if you’re going to focus on one single issue, the increasing unaffordability of housing is a good one. Wouldn’t it be great to see this party outpoll the !@#$%ing Libertarians? (Update: Gothamist reports that McMillan has some seriously anti-Semitic, seriously weird stuff on his site. I don’t know how they managed to actually read his site that thoroughly; I suppose one could call this obscurity through unusability? Thanks to rubytramp for pointing this out.)

In answer to the obvious question: After their torpedoing of Gore’s candidacy in 2000, I will never again vote for a Green candidate under any circumstances, ever. The Green Party’s most enduring legacy will be the right-wing Supreme Court we’ll have for the next 25 years or so. I’d vote for Bernie Goetz before I’d vote for a Green candidate. (Yes, that Bernie Goetz is running for Public Advocate. Duck!)

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment

What’s going on? What the HELL is going on???

And I ain’t seen nothin but trouble baby
Nobody really understands, no no
And I go to the place where the good feelin’ awaits me
Self-destruction in my hand.

–Marvin Gaye, 1971

Billboard sighted on Flatbush Avenue, just north of Seventh Avenue.

On a lighter note

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

Overheard in email…

steelbrassnwood: Sometimes the attributions are as good as the quotes on Overheard In NY:

Because Mr. Cruise is Clearly Well Balanced
L. Ron Hubtard: Do you have stress?
Man: I live in New York, what the fuck do you think? “Do I have stress?” Fuck you.

bobhowe: The whole thing is hysterical. When shunn and I were leaving Boston there was a Dianetics table set up in South Station. I’d like to test THEIR stress levels.
steelbrassnwood: A few months ago a friend and I were walking through Times Square, past those idiots, and I just gave them the finger as I walked by. She was a few steps behind me and the Hubtard said, “Now *there’s* some stress!”
bobhowe: Well, I’d say his diagnostic skills are pretty good. : )
steelbrassnwood: Oh fuck him and the UFO he rode in on. (I have no idea what you mean.)

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Analog Curmudgeon Day

I just posted a response to Travis Nep Smith’s “Top 10 Reasons For Reading a News Site,” because today I seem to be in a particularly contrary, analog, curmudgeonly kind of mood. I think digital media has a great future, but paper and ink are pretty damn good too. So I present…

(Edit: Travis reposted my comment as its own article.)
Top 10 Reasons to Read a Newspaper

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 2 Comments

The Tragedy Of the Communal

At this point, it seems fair to ask exactly when the intelligence in “collective intelligence” will begin to manifest itself.

Blogger Nicholas Carr, talking about the badly written and frequently inaccurate Wikipedia in his skeptical article about the community-driven “Web 2.0.”

Communal writing, like communal software development, communal music-making, or communal anything else, benefits from expertise and organization. This should not come as a surprise, and it doesn’t mean that open-source software, or blogs, or bluegrass jams, can’t be wonderful. It just means that some things will never change, no matter what technology you throw at the problem. Ten years ago, it was “way-new journalism” where “everyone is a reporter!” Back then, the question was, “where are the editors?” Now it’s “Everyone’s an editor!” Riiiiiiiight.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 1 Comment