-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Archives
- August 2015
- October 2014
- August 2014
- June 2014
- November 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- June 2013
- April 2013
- October 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- August 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
Categories
Meta
Sour Grapes Rant
I’m in the midst of Annie Proulx’s Close Range: Wyoming Stories, from which comes the short story “Brokeback Mountain.” The stories are typically stark and beautiful, although sometimes the bitterness and bleakness get to be a bit much. (As they did in the flatly unreadable Accordion Crimes.)
But speaking of bitter and flatly unreadable, Proulx had a column recently in the Guardian, where she gives us a vinefull of sour grapes about Brokeback’s failure to win an Oscar. I can certainly sympathize with her depiction of the ceremony — “the hours sped by on wings of boiler plate. … three-and-a-half hours of butt-numbing sitting” — but couldn’t she have figured out how annoying and trivial the ceremony would have been, and stayed in Wyoming? Would she have carped as loudly had Brokeback won?
Reading it made me happy it lost, to be honest; while it was a better film than Crash, Good Night and Good Luck was more timely, more beautifully shot, and better acted than either one of them. Proulx says,
Hollywood loves mimicry, the conversion of a film actor into the spittin’ image of a once-living celeb. But which takes more skill, acting a person who strolled the boulevard a few decades ago and who left behind tapes, film, photographs, voice recordings and friends with strong memories, or the construction of characters from imagination and a few cold words on the page? I don’t know. The subject never comes up. Cheers to David Strathairn, Joaquin Phoenix and Hoffman, but what about actors who start in the dark?
I don’t know that either is less of an acting challenge, but one could say that Heath Ledger’s main job in the film seemed to be to say as little as possible while maintaining the exact same expression on his face. One could say that, in particular, after enduring the brickbats Proulx hurls at everyone within reach including the bystanders.
“For those who call this little piece a Sour Grapes Rant, play it as it lays,” she concludes her column. I just did.
To T.O.
Mike and I will be returning to Toronto for our second annual (hey, I work on the Internet; two points definitely make a trend) show at the Renaissance Cafe, in the Danforth. I’m looking forward to the show and to another visit to Toronto, which has joined the very short list of “cities I could happily live in.” The big date is Good Friday, April 14.
If you don’t want to drive ten hours to Toronto, you can take the train for hopefully less than ten hours (depending, of course, on the mood of the west side IRT) and catch our show the following week at the Underground Lounge on the upper west side. We’ll be there on Friday, April 21. I’ll be doing a half-hour solo set, and then I’ll join Mike for part of his set. We both have new songs, so come on out and see for free what you’d otherwise have to pay CN$5 (and plane fare) to see in Canada.
I’ll also be doing a show on Staten Island this Friday night, with Caroline Cutroneo. Unfortunately, you can’t take the subway to Staten Island no matter how long you wait, and there are no direct flights.
Details, as always, are on my site.
At Least He Can Probably Pronounce “India”
The wonderful Arundhati Roy has a typically scathing article in The Nation about Shrub’s visit to India, where he’ll be speaking not to the Parliament (whose members have a nasty habit of thinking for themselves and speaking up, and cannot be arrested and ejected the way American citizens can), but at a medeival fort that also contains the Delhi zoo. She says,
George Bush’s audience will be a few hundred caged animals and an approved list of caged human beings, who in India go under the category of “eminent persons.” They’re mostly rich folk who live in our poor country like captive animals, incarcerated by their own wealth, locked and barred in their gilded cages, protecting themselves from the threat of the vulgar and unruly multitudes whom they have systematically dispossessed over the centuries.
So what’s going to happen to George W. Bush? Will the gorillas cheer him on? … Will the crocs recognize a kindred soul? Will the quails give thanks that Bush isn’t traveling with Dick Cheney, his hunting partner with the notoriously bad aim? Will the CEOs agree?
She is particularly incensed, with good reason, at the idea of Shrub visiting the Gandhi memorial, which is indeed a bit like Tom Metzger visiting the Lorraine Motel (although in fact Metzger is probably too honest to do so).